Down and Out in Paris and London

Down and Out in Paris and London

Category: (Book)

48 new, starting at $6.97

76 used, starting at $4.15

Buy Now

Editorial Reviews

This unusual fictional account, in good part autobiographical, narrates without self-pity and often with humor the adventures of a penniless British writer among the down-and-out of two great cities. In the tales of both cities we learn some sobering Orwellian truths about poverty and society.

What was a nice Eton boy like Eric Blair doing in scummy slums instead of being upwardly mobile at Oxford or Cambridge? Living Down and Out in Paris and London, repudiating respectable imperialist society, and reinventing himself as George Orwell. His 1933 debut book (ostensibly a novel, but overwhelmingly autobiographical) was rejected by that elitist publisher T.S. Eliot, perhaps because its close-up portrait of lowlife was too pungent for comfort.

In Paris, Orwell lived in verminous rooms and washed dishes at the overpriced "Hotel X," in a remarkably filthy, 110-degree kitchen. He met "eccentric people--people who have fallen into solitary, half-mad grooves of life and given up trying to be normal or decent." Though Orwell's tone is that of an outraged reformer, it's surprising how entertaining many of his adventures are: gnawing poverty only enlivens the imagination, and the wild characters he met often swindled each other and themselves. The wackiest tale involves a miser who ate cats, wore newspapers for underwear, invested 6,000 francs in cocaine, and hid it in a face-powder tin when the cops raided. They had to free him, because the apparently controlled substance turned out to be face powder instead of cocaine.

In London, Orwell studied begging with a crippled expert named Bozo, a great storyteller and philosopher. Orwell devotes a chapter to the fine points of London guttersnipe slang. Years later, he would put his lexical bent to work by inventing Newspeak, and draw on his down-and-out experience to evoke the plight of the Proles in 1984. Though marred by hints of unexamined anti-Semitism, Orwell's debut remains, as The Nation put it, "the most lucid portrait of poverty in the English language." --Tim Appelo

Customer Reviews

Never say never...

Reviewed by CoffeeGurl, 2009-12-01

Can you imagine suddenly living in the slums and working like a madman just to eat and survive? That's what happens to the narrator of this story (Eric Blair?). He has lived a respectable life, never with worries. That is until his money gets stolen while in Paris. Now, with the help of a man with a lame leg, he will have to take whatever job comes his way until he can make enough money to survive and eat and to one day return to London. He does whatever is necessary, including considering writing for Russian communists in order to earn good money. (The Russian communists, however, are nothing but thieves themselves.) He resorts to working in the lowest positions at restaurants and hotels. The narrator learns about life in the slums, about the different slang words, the world of "tramps," and the hierarchy found in restaurants -- how waiters are considered better than cooks, etc. Tough lessons are learned. Will he be able to see the world and poverty the same way again?

This is an interesting novel. It is said that Down and Out in Paris and London is autobiographical. Eric Blair (pseudonym George Orwell) was an Eton-educated man and a writer on the rise. Had he gone through all of the horrors described in this book? The book tells some interesting backstories on characters and their lives in the streets. The vivid descriptions would lead one to believe that all of these things are true. This book is also full of humor. There are scenes that made me laugh. First published in 1933, Down and Out in Paris and London was Orwell's first published book. It is nowhere near as amazing or as vivid as 1984, but it's a great read if you like stuff about the early 20th Century slums. You won't regret it if you're a new Orwell fan like myself.

A SPECIFIC AGAINST FEELINGS OF ENTITLEMENT

Reviewed by Josef Bush, 2009-10-25

The kind of Entitlement we feel as Americans is something made up mostly of the funk exuded from the idol we revere of ourselves as Middle Class people -- one myth created by decades of Madison Avenue advertising, and a lie like most of them -- which we don't recognize because TV and pulp infortainment have blinded us with the vulgar dazzle of celebrity-hood, until dopey, we have come to feel that we know them, the celebrated PEOPLE people; that we share their quirks and inhsecurities; that we have so much in common with them -- trouble with excess weight, with prescription drugs, papparazzi, out-of-control credit card debt -- that we are celebrities too. That we too are people who need people who need people like us. I mean, we're all American, aren't we? A rich, successful and powerful classless society? ...Of ordinary people, with excellent credit. No? But... Haven't you ever travelled to strange places and looked at your fellow-citizens and wondered sometimes, Who in the world do they think they are? So rude! So inane! So pretensious! And, of course, they're our Neighbors. Our selves.

I've heard it said, "With foreign travel its either palaces or poverty." But you don't have to go to another country to come face-to-face with the big P; with the unspeakable danger, Poverty. And that's what everybody's afraid of. Looking at a recently released and much-praised movie recently, THE WRESTLER, one sensed that this evocation in contemporary style of a favorite genre from Depression days, one had the feeling that much of the attention to it and praise of it was generated by the fact that it looked as though it might have been filmed in Manesquan, NJ; that is, on location somewhere below the poverty line. And the public reaction was sincere embarassment on one hand, and on the other, gratitude for not being that poor oneself.

DOWN AND OUT was published in 1933, that fateful year Roosevelt got his Congress and HItler got his Reischtag; the nadir of the Great Global Depression that began in '29, and the book was possibly written two or three years earlier. Considering the shape the world was in, with the financial systems of Europe and America and everywhere else in collapse, and including the inevitable unemployment and the resulting wide-spread poverty, it is astonishing to contemplate Orwell, young and only trying to make a career for himself, deciding to not run off to a foreign country, as he did later when he went to Spain, but deciding to leap head-first, as it were, into Poverty, POVERTY ITSELF, in the country just across the channel. Simply to have experiences? Simply to have something to write about? To have subjects for his fledgling journalism? Yes! Apparently so. On the final page of the book he writes that he believes he may have written a kind of Travel Book. He did! And the means are shocking; the effects quite free of tinted light. Except that the second, third and fourth letter of the commonest Anglo-Saxon epithet are deleted in print, there are no euphemisms. But oh! my foes and ah! my friends, the results are spectacular. What extraordinary courage! What powers of observation and description!

Here is a tourist who does not intend to look at the world through the windows of the Hilton lobby. Imagine: Without even a credit card! You don't know what to say. You stand back, gasp in admiration and wonder if you would ever have the nerve to undertake anything like it; the discomfort, the embarassment. Work as a Dishwasher? Me? And you wonder if you would ever have the nerve to be as honest with yourself as you wrote it? Honest about your squeamishness? About your dirt hatred. About being seen among uneducated people. About the fear of looking dirty. Or going a week without changing clothes.

The English have written some great travel books. I've always admired Cunningham-Grahame and Maugham, but this book is different. It doesn't cover much land or take a great deal of time, but it plummets to depths often ignored by other authors. Depths of the human soul and condition so terrifying to many -- which never terrified him -- I'm reminded of that french song...

"Children with faithful hearts have no fear of wolves."

Ritz Plongeur? Moi? Quelle cauchemar.

True Grit

Reviewed by C. wood, 2009-09-15

Gritty realism. This is one of Orwell's three great travel journalism books. "Homage to Catalona," and "Road to Wigan Pier" being the other two. These three books are his greatest works; they identify Orwell's journalistic genius. A book written at the encouragement or possible coercion of his publisher. Do not forget the source material for this book.

The source material for this book can be found in "In an Age Like This" with its journals on poverty in London and Paris written in the twenties and thirties. One interesting essay, "How the Poor Die" was written much later and appears in "In Front of Your Nose." the fourth of the four volume series edited by his last wife Sonia Orwell. Written after WWII, "How the Poor Die" recounts his stay in an unnamed Paris charity hospital during his youth as a dishwasher during the period covered by "Down and Out in Paris and London." Morbid reading.Orwell had chronic lung problems, and describes in his essay what it was like becoming an anatomical subject for french medical students under early welfare state medicine.

Read the source material for this book to get a richer Orwell experience!

Orwell is great, but mobi. . .

Reviewed by David Okubo, 2009-07-24

Orwell's text on his time spent among the lower echelons of Parisian and London society is great, and though it is a bit dated by some of its topics (for one, can you imagine a casual ward in London in the present day?) the sentiments and deeper observations that the sharp Orwell makes of poverty and the rough lifestyle are excellent and worth reading. But I'm sure many people with a deeper knowledge of Orwell have said much more enlightening things about this text -- that's not my point.

Mobi's translation of Orwell's original work. A colorful (and probably very entertaining, were it not censored) discussion of blasphemies and obscenities is ruined by censoring, leaving it entirely up to the reader's imagination as to what he's talking about -- I ended up skimming through the section because without actually knowing which profanities he's referring to, the discussion is almost useless.

Also, there were more than a few typos in the transcription. I understand that with translations from British English to American English, there are small differences in the spellings of words; translating from older English to contemporary English will reveal different spellings as well. However, these were more just common errors in simple everyday words, and I suspect (and hope) that these were not Orwell's errors, but rather someone much further down the publishing line. It's a minor annoyance.

A vivid description of poverty

Reviewed by Wil Roese, 2009-07-20

This is not a political novel of the type that 1884 or Animal Farm is, but it is a vivid description of poverty and restaurant life in Paris. If you think your life sucks it will make you feel well off

-Wil