Category: (Book)
48 new, starting at $6.97
76 used, starting at $4.15
What was a nice Eton boy like Eric Blair doing in scummy slums instead of being upwardly mobile at Oxford or Cambridge? Living Down and Out in Paris and London, repudiating respectable imperialist society, and reinventing himself as George Orwell. His 1933 debut book (ostensibly a novel, but overwhelmingly autobiographical) was rejected by that elitist publisher T.S. Eliot, perhaps because its close-up portrait of lowlife was too pungent for comfort.
In Paris, Orwell lived in verminous rooms and washed dishes at the overpriced "Hotel X," in a remarkably filthy, 110-degree kitchen. He met "eccentric people--people who have fallen into solitary, half-mad grooves of life and given up trying to be normal or decent." Though Orwell's tone is that of an outraged reformer, it's surprising how entertaining many of his adventures are: gnawing poverty only enlivens the imagination, and the wild characters he met often swindled each other and themselves. The wackiest tale involves a miser who ate cats, wore newspapers for underwear, invested 6,000 francs in cocaine, and hid it in a face-powder tin when the cops raided. They had to free him, because the apparently controlled substance turned out to be face powder instead of cocaine.
In London, Orwell studied begging with a crippled expert named Bozo, a great storyteller and philosopher. Orwell devotes a chapter to the fine points of London guttersnipe slang. Years later, he would put his lexical bent to work by inventing Newspeak, and draw on his down-and-out experience to evoke the plight of the Proles in 1984. Though marred by hints of unexamined anti-Semitism, Orwell's debut remains, as The Nation put it, "the most lucid portrait of poverty in the English language." --Tim Appelo
Never say never...Reviewed by CoffeeGurl, 2009-12-01
Can you imagine suddenly living in the slums and working like a
madman just to eat and survive? That's what happens to the narrator
of this story (Eric Blair?). He has lived a respectable life, never
with worries. That is until his money gets stolen while in Paris.
Now, with the help of a man with a lame leg, he will have to take
whatever job comes his way until he can make enough money to
survive and eat and to one day return to London. He does whatever
is necessary, including considering writing for Russian communists
in order to earn good money. (The Russian communists, however, are
nothing but thieves themselves.) He resorts to working in the
lowest positions at restaurants and hotels. The narrator learns
about life in the slums, about the different slang words, the world
of "tramps," and the hierarchy found in restaurants -- how waiters
are considered better than cooks, etc. Tough lessons are learned.
Will he be able to see the world and poverty the same way
again?
This is an interesting novel. It is said that Down and Out in Paris
and London is autobiographical. Eric Blair (pseudonym George
Orwell) was an Eton-educated man and a writer on the rise. Had he
gone through all of the horrors described in this book? The book
tells some interesting backstories on characters and their lives in
the streets. The vivid descriptions would lead one to believe that
all of these things are true. This book is also full of humor.
There are scenes that made me laugh. First published in 1933, Down
and Out in Paris and London was Orwell's first published book. It
is nowhere near as amazing or as vivid as 1984, but it's a great
read if you like stuff about the early 20th Century slums. You
won't regret it if you're a new Orwell fan like myself.
A SPECIFIC AGAINST FEELINGS OF ENTITLEMENTReviewed by Josef Bush, 2009-10-25
The kind of Entitlement we feel as Americans is something made up
mostly of the funk exuded from the idol we revere of ourselves as
Middle Class people -- one myth created by decades of Madison
Avenue advertising, and a lie like most of them -- which we don't
recognize because TV and pulp infortainment have blinded us with
the vulgar dazzle of celebrity-hood, until dopey, we have come to
feel that we know them, the celebrated PEOPLE people; that we share
their quirks and inhsecurities; that we have so much in common with
them -- trouble with excess weight, with prescription drugs,
papparazzi, out-of-control credit card debt -- that we are
celebrities too. That we too are people who need people who need
people like us. I mean, we're all American, aren't we? A rich,
successful and powerful classless society? ...Of ordinary people,
with excellent credit. No? But... Haven't you ever travelled to
strange places and looked at your fellow-citizens and wondered
sometimes, Who in the world do they think they are? So rude! So
inane! So pretensious! And, of course, they're our Neighbors. Our
selves.
I've heard it said, "With foreign travel its either palaces or
poverty." But you don't have to go to another country to come
face-to-face with the big P; with the unspeakable danger, Poverty.
And that's what everybody's afraid of. Looking at a recently
released and much-praised movie recently, THE WRESTLER, one sensed
that this evocation in contemporary style of a favorite genre from
Depression days, one had the feeling that much of the attention to
it and praise of it was generated by the fact that it looked as
though it might have been filmed in Manesquan, NJ; that is, on
location somewhere below the poverty line. And the public reaction
was sincere embarassment on one hand, and on the other, gratitude
for not being that poor oneself.
DOWN AND OUT was published in 1933, that fateful year Roosevelt got
his Congress and HItler got his Reischtag; the nadir of the Great
Global Depression that began in '29, and the book was possibly
written two or three years earlier. Considering the shape the world
was in, with the financial systems of Europe and America and
everywhere else in collapse, and including the inevitable
unemployment and the resulting wide-spread poverty, it is
astonishing to contemplate Orwell, young and only trying to make a
career for himself, deciding to not run off to a foreign country,
as he did later when he went to Spain, but deciding to leap
head-first, as it were, into Poverty, POVERTY ITSELF, in the
country just across the channel. Simply to have experiences? Simply
to have something to write about? To have subjects for his
fledgling journalism? Yes! Apparently so. On the final page of the
book he writes that he believes he may have written a kind of
Travel Book. He did! And the means are shocking; the effects quite
free of tinted light. Except that the second, third and fourth
letter of the commonest Anglo-Saxon epithet are deleted in print,
there are no euphemisms. But oh! my foes and ah! my friends, the
results are spectacular. What extraordinary courage! What powers of
observation and description!
Here is a tourist who does not intend to look at the world through
the windows of the Hilton lobby. Imagine: Without even a credit
card! You don't know what to say. You stand back, gasp in
admiration and wonder if you would ever have the nerve to undertake
anything like it; the discomfort, the embarassment. Work as a
Dishwasher? Me? And you wonder if you would ever have the nerve to
be as honest with yourself as you wrote it? Honest about your
squeamishness? About your dirt hatred. About being seen among
uneducated people. About the fear of looking dirty. Or going a week
without changing clothes.
The English have written some great travel books. I've always
admired Cunningham-Grahame and Maugham, but this book is different.
It doesn't cover much land or take a great deal of time, but it
plummets to depths often ignored by other authors. Depths of the
human soul and condition so terrifying to many -- which never
terrified him -- I'm reminded of that french song...
"Children with faithful hearts have no fear of wolves."
Ritz Plongeur? Moi? Quelle cauchemar.
True GritReviewed by C. wood, 2009-09-15
Gritty realism. This is one of Orwell's three great travel
journalism books. "Homage to Catalona," and "Road to Wigan Pier"
being the other two. These three books are his greatest works; they
identify Orwell's journalistic genius. A book written at the
encouragement or possible coercion of his publisher. Do not forget
the source material for this book.
The source material for this book can be found in "In an Age Like
This" with its journals on poverty in London and Paris written in
the twenties and thirties. One interesting essay, "How the Poor
Die" was written much later and appears in "In Front of Your Nose."
the fourth of the four volume series edited by his last wife Sonia
Orwell. Written after WWII, "How the Poor Die" recounts his stay in
an unnamed Paris charity hospital during his youth as a dishwasher
during the period covered by "Down and Out in Paris and London."
Morbid reading.Orwell had chronic lung problems, and describes in
his essay what it was like becoming an anatomical subject for
french medical students under early welfare state medicine.
Read the source material for this book to get a richer Orwell
experience!
Orwell is great, but mobi. . .Reviewed by David Okubo, 2009-07-24
Orwell's text on his time spent among the lower echelons of
Parisian and London society is great, and though it is a bit dated
by some of its topics (for one, can you imagine a casual ward in
London in the present day?) the sentiments and deeper observations
that the sharp Orwell makes of poverty and the rough lifestyle are
excellent and worth reading. But I'm sure many people with a deeper
knowledge of Orwell have said much more enlightening things about
this text -- that's not my point.
Mobi's translation of Orwell's original work. A colorful (and
probably very entertaining, were it not censored) discussion of
blasphemies and obscenities is ruined by censoring, leaving it
entirely up to the reader's imagination as to what he's talking
about -- I ended up skimming through the section because without
actually knowing which profanities he's referring to, the
discussion is almost useless.
Also, there were more than a few typos in the transcription. I
understand that with translations from British English to American
English, there are small differences in the spellings of words;
translating from older English to contemporary English will reveal
different spellings as well. However, these were more just common
errors in simple everyday words, and I suspect (and hope) that
these were not Orwell's errors, but rather someone much further
down the publishing line. It's a minor annoyance.
A vivid description of povertyReviewed by Wil Roese, 2009-07-20
This is not a political novel of the type that 1884 or Animal Farm
is, but it is a vivid description of poverty and restaurant life in
Paris. If you think your life sucks it will make you feel well
off
-Wil